首页> 外文OA文献 >Manual and Automated Instrumentation for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae and Other Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacilli
【2h】

Manual and Automated Instrumentation for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae and Other Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacilli

机译:手动和自动仪器鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和其他需氧革兰阴性杆菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Identification of gram-negative bacilli, both enteric and nonenteric, by conventional methods is not realistic for clinical microbiology laboratories performing routine cultures in today's world. The use of commercial kits, either manual or automated, to identify these organisms is a common practice. The advent of rapid or “spot” testing has eliminated the need for some commonly isolated organisms to be identified with the systems approach. Commercially available systems provide more in-depth identification to the species level as well as detect new and unusual strains. The answers obtained from these systems may not always be correct and must be interpreted with caution. The patient demographics, laboratory workload and work flow, and technologist's skill levels should dictate the system of choice. Cost considerations introduce another variable into the equation affecting choice. Each system has its own strengths and weaknesses, and each laboratory must decide on the level of sophistication that fulfills its particular needs.
机译:对于当今世界进行常规培养的临床微生物学实验室而言,通过常规方法鉴定革兰氏阴性细菌(肠和非肠杆菌)是不现实的。通常使用人工或自动的商业试剂盒来鉴定这些生物。快速或“现场”测试的出现消除了使用系统方法识别某些通常分离的生物的需要。可商购的系统提供了对物种水平的更深入的识别以及检测新的和异常的菌株。从这些系统获得的答案可能并不总是正确的,因此必须谨慎解释。患者的人口统计资料,实验室工作量和工作流程以及技术人员的技能水平应决定选择的系统。成本因素将另一个变量引入影响选择的方程式中。每个系统都有其优点和缺点,每个实验室都必须确定满足其特定需求的复杂程度。

著录项

  • 作者

    O'Hara, Caroline M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号